Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 06:02
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Amanda Seyfried, Adam Brody on Parenting, Jennifer's Body and More - Variety
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
"Oh, Mary!" star Cole Escola manifested their Tony win the old-fashioned way - Salon.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
I tested Apple’s 11th-gen iPad for a week, and it’s still the best tablet - CNN
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What are the differences between promotions and sales?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Apple’s latest AirPods Pro with USB-C just received a $70 discount - The Verge
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
SpaceX launch from California sends 26 Starlink satellites into low Earth orbit - Space
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What might be the social consequences of an ethnic as opposed to a civic conception of the nation?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
With retail cyberattacks on the rise, customers find orders blocked and shelves empty - AP News
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.